![]() ![]() Or, sign up to watch this super informative webinar on How to Avoid the ‘Dependency Confusion’ Software Supply Chain Hack. “ Newly Identified Dependency Confusion Packages Target Amazon, Zillow, and Slack Go Beyond Just Bug Bounties.” See our handy guide on Preventing Namesapce Confusion. If you’d like to dig deeper into the topics of npm dependency confusion, or typosquatting examples, check out Sonatype’s blog. Attackers know that developers may mistake the attacker’s component for the real thing when quickly browsing the list.Attackers know that typos happen, and capitalize on developers making typographical errors.But, intentionally misspell the malicious component name. They make sure their malicious components share the same name and spelling of legitimate components.Attackers post malicious components to public repos (npm/PyPI/RubyGems….).Here are some details around typosquatting attacks: ![]() So, what is typosquatting? I’m glad you asked. Typosquatting is a type of dependency confusion as well. At times, the attackers may use names of dependencies that no longer exist to confuse the package managers.ĭazed and confused, I’m happy to tame your tizzy.When the attackers place the malicious code of the same name in the public repo, they ensure it has a higher version number than the intended package.Most installers are configured to pick the file with the highest version number. How does the attack succeed? There are two files of the same name.*depending on how you configure your tools. When this happens, the public dependency gets pulled into your code, instead of your own, private one. on npm/PyPI/RubyGems/other repo), it has the same name as your private dependency. When they publish it to the public (e.g.Next, they place malicious code with the same name in public package repositories. Attackers identify the internal package names.They trick your script to pull in a malicious software (malware) file instead of the intended file. Attackers deliberately confuse your package managers. ![]() (If you’re thinking ‘what’s a software supply chain, that’s another story for another day :0)). This is also known as dependency hijacking, and namespace confusion. □ Now, What Does Dependency Confusion Mean?ĭependency confusion is one type of software supply chain attack. It’s also informally known as namespace confusion. So, to quell some of your angst, know that dependency confusion is sometimes referred to as dependency hijacking. □ And you’re right on in recognizing the importance of grasping all of these terms. You’re not alone in being discombobulated about dependency confusion. Will you please help me to clarify and define these terms? I’m also not good with namespace confusion? And I’m in a real tizzy about typosquatting? I know that simply overlooking these terms isn’t an option, and I want to be well-versed as I explain their importance to decision-makers in my org. I’m dreading the topic of dependency hijacking. I am confused about dependency confusion attacks.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |